9
Sep
Choosing the Right Lab Automation Equipment for Your Workflow
Every laboratory is different. A high-throughput diagnostic lab has vastly different automation needs compared to a secondary school science classroom or a university teaching lab. The key to success is choosing automation equipment that fits your workflow, sample volume, and compliance requirements. At LabChoice Australia, we help institutions select solutions that balance affordability, accuracy, and scalability, ensuring automation adds real value rather than unnecessary complexity.
Key Factors to Consider
1. Sample Throughput
- Low-throughput labs (teaching labs, small research groups) benefit from semi-automated systems like benchtop pipetting stations.
- Medium-to-high-throughput labs (universities, diagnostics) require fully automated liquid handling robots and plate readers.
2. Workflow Complexity
- Simple workflows (e.g., PCR prep, titrations) may only require entry-level automation.
- Complex workflows (e.g., multiplex assays, sequencing prep) benefit from integrated systems with digital logging.
3. Compliance Requirements
- Labs working under AS/NZS 2243, ISO 17025, or GLP need automation that generates traceable, reproducible records.
- LabChoice systems support compliance with audit-ready digital data capture.
4. Integration with Existing Equipment
- Automation should complement microscopes, PCR machines, balances, and storage systems already in use.
- LabChoice ensures compatibility across consumables and reagents for seamless integration.
5. Budget and Scalability
- Schools may prioritise affordability and durability.
- Research labs may invest in scalable solutions with upgrade options for future expansion.
Comparison: Manual vs Semi-Automated vs Fully Automated Workflows
Factor | Manual Workflow | Semi-Automated Workflow | Fully Automated Workflow |
---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | Prone to human error | Improved, but some manual input remains | High reproducibility, audit-ready data |
Speed | Slow, labour-intensive | Moderate throughput | High throughput, fast processing |
Staff Involvement | High | Medium | Low – staff focus on analysis |
Compliance | Paper logs, error-prone | Partial compliance | Full compliance (ISO/GLP-ready) |
Cost | Low upfront, high long-term error cost | Moderate | Higher upfront, lower long-term cost |
This comparison shows how LabChoice supports every level of automation, from teaching labs starting with small upgrades to advanced research facilities requiring full robotic workflows.
FAQs
Q1: How do I know if my lab needs full automation?
Labs with high sample throughput or strict compliance needs benefit most from full automation. Smaller labs may start with semi-automated systems.
Q2: Can automation integrate with my existing instruments?
Yes. LabChoice supplies compatible automation solutions designed to work with common reagents, PCR machines, and storage systems.
Q3: Is automation affordable for schools?
Yes. LabChoice offers scaled packages and semi-automated tools that bring accuracy and safety without overwhelming budgets.
Q4: Does LabChoice provide consultation before purchase?
Yes. Our technical team works with schools, universities, and research labs to design solutions tailored to specific workflows.
Refined References
- Safe Work Australia – Laboratory Workflow Safety. Safe Work Australia
- ISO 17025 – General Requirements for Testing and Calibration. ISO
- OECD – Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). OECD
- CSIRO – Automation in Australian Research. CSIRO